This is an eye catching and I think my readers would like to read and share.
The images and the content here are very important as well as interesting to read and visualize. It illustrates how certain spacies in the animal kingdom are in decline according to the world report. It also reiterated how mankind are contributing to that decline of the species. Here, it reveals to us on how we are getting less traffic in our commute with the advantage of the Big Data. It explains how the largest passenger pplane in the world whould fly the longest route in the world. http://mashable.com/2014/09/29/qantas-sydney-dallas-plane/
It aalso states how Pluto might making it’s way back as the ninth celestial nextdoor neighbor after an eight year exile from the list of technical planets in our ssolar system. http://mashable.com/2014/10/02/pluto-planet-again/
After an eight year exile from the list of technical planets in our solar system, Pluto might be making its way back as our ninth celestial next-door neighbor.
US & World
Study Says Half World’s Wildlife Has Vanished Since 1970. Is It Misleading?
This site can be logged on for further interesting readings and pictures:
Rhinos, an endangered species, in South Africa.
Image: Flickr, Steve Evans
By Kari Paul1 day ago
Humans are causing populations of wildlife around the world to decline at a rate much higher than previously thought, according to a study released Tuesday by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).
See also: 11 Great Shots of Wildlife in Its Natural Setting
The environmental group’s biennial Living Planet Report found the number of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish in the wild dropped more than 50% between 1970 and 2010.
Jon Hoekstra, Chief Scientist at World Wildlife Fund said the population decline is far greater than researchers initially anticipated.
“This is the tenth of our Living Planets Report, so we have been tracking it for years, but the scientists who crunched the numbers updated their methods and found far more than expected,” he said.
“The scale is jaw dropping.
The fact that there is half as much wildlife in the world as there was when I was born is really staggering.
The fact that there is half as much wildlife in the world as there was when I was born is really staggering.”
The report attributes most of the decline to human activity, including overfishing, habitat loss, climate change and other man-made factors. The study found humans are consuming resources at an unsustainable rate, using 1.5 Earths-worth of resources each year.
Scientists researched 10,380 separate populations of 3,038 species, and developed an indicator called the Living Planet Index to measure trends over time. The region that experienced the biggest losses was South America, where terrestrial wildlife has been reduced by 83% since 1970.
Freshwater species were hit the hardest worldwide, with animals including fish, ducks, geese, frogs and salamanders experiencing a decline of 76%.
Stuart Pimm, a biology professor at Duke University and prominent expert in animal extinction, criticized the Living Planet Index for being too confusing to accurately interpret.
“What it shows is that the variety of life on earth is in trouble — and that broad conclusion is absolutely correct,” Pimm told Mashable. “But the problem with this particular index is that it lumps all sorts of things together, and doesn’t do it in a way that is terribly helpful.”
Pimm says the study gives the public the false impression that 50% of animals have gone extinct in the last 40 years. He agrees that biodiversity is at risk, but says the index does not accurately quantify the losses over the years.
“Are there populations that are becoming scarcer? Yes. Does that mean they’re going extinct? No, they’re declining, they haven’t gone extinct, they’re just worse off than they were 40 years ago,” he said.
Pimm said he thinks it would be more beneficial to focus on the top environmental problems — which he identified as species extinction, the depletion of tropical rain forests, poaching and overfishing.
“The [Living Planet Index] is an attempt to come up with a single number that the world can understand as a measure of what is happening to biological diversity,” he said. “I understand the need to do that, but I think the general public are smart enough that they can understand a few different issues at once.”
Given the current pace of decline, the WWF report warned, the “possibility of reaching critical tipping points” can no longer be excluded. But Pimm said the notion of such a tipping point is not supported by research.
“That is a complete fabrication,” he said. “It’s an attempt to grab attention to a particular view of the world. There is simply no evidence that there is some point below which biodiversity cannot go.”
Tipping points are, however, well-accepted possibilities when it comes to global warming — where a certain amount of global warming could cause a self-sustaining loss of the Greenland ice sheet, for example.
In an earlier statement, Hoekstra acknowledged that the study is dense. But he said the conclusions are clear: It is time to take action.
“There is a lot of data in this report and it can seem very overwhelming and complex,” he said. “What’s not complicated are the clear trends we’re seeing — 39 percent of terrestrial wildlife gone, 39 percent of marine wildlife gone, 76 percent of freshwater wildlife gone –- all in the past 40 years.”
Hoekstra said the WWF is hopeful that species decline can be reversed, but that it will take a widespread effort to make a change.
“This should come across as a real wake up call to us all, that the environmental problems we have all been aware of are far more serious than we thought,” he said. “The time is now to take action if we are going to save wildlife, and save ourselves in the process.”
Have something to add to this story? Share it in the comments.
Topics: US & World, wildlife, World, world wildlife fund